![]() |
The
Mosca Law Firm Email: MoscaLawFirm@gmail.com Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer and DUI Defense Lawyer |
|
Jacksonville Criminal Defense and DUI Defense Homepage |
Practice Areas and Success Stories | Defense Attorney Biography | Contact Criminal & DUI Defense Law Firm |
|
There is never a charge for an initial consultation |
Case Numbers Available Upon Request T.S. was charged with D.U.I. after being found asleep in her vehicle. She refused to do field sobriety tests and to take a breath test. The officers noted an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. I obtained the internal videos from the jail which showed her walking, standing, and interacting with no apparent impairment and was able to offer her the choice of trial or a plea of guilty to reckless driving, adjudication withheld. N.A. was charged with D.U.I. after almost hitting a police car at an intersection. The officer cited breath, bloodshot eyes, and the driver's admission that he recently had a single drink. There was video of the field sobriety tests but the driver refused the breath test. N.A. chose to go to trial and the jury found him not guilty. T.A. was charged with possession of crack cocaine after police saw him talking to a friend at a gas station and decided to stop and search him as he walked away. The drugs were found under the vehicle and police alleged he threw them there. I filed a Motion to Suppress the evidence and won. The State Attorney dropped the charges. C.H. was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and was facing a minimum mandatory three year prison sentence. I was able to get the charges reduced to a misdemeanor to which C.H. plead guilty and sentenced to the time he had already served.
D.K. was charged with possession of cocaine while driving a relative's vehicle. A Motion to Suppress was filed but the judge believed the officer's testimony and denied the motion. D.K. refused even the State's sweetened offer and we proceeded to trial. After hearing the officer's version and my cross examination, the jury found for D.K. G.S. was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, facing a three year minimum mandatory sentence. He said the gun was not his. There were no fingerprints on the gun. After deposing all the witnesses and officers, it was discovered that two different officers, each saying they were alone at the time, claimed to have found the same weapon near where G.S. was arrested. We set the case for trial. The Friday before we were to pick a jury, the State offered G.S. time served if he would plead guilty. With two decent options in hand, G.S. chose to plead guilty for time served and avoid the risk of going to trial. D.S. was charged with drug trafficking after police intercepted a Fed-Ex package full of marijuana sent to his address. The police opened the box without a warrant based on a drug dog alert and proceeded to arrest D.S. and eventually obtained a confession. D.S. faced a mandatory minimum sentence of three years in the Florida State prison. I filed Motions to Suppress the evidence and the confession based on lack of probable cause, search without warrant, and a coerced confession. After reviewing the argument and law upon which the motions were based, the State Attorney decided to dismiss the charges. In a civil suit filed in Circuit Court, P.B. was sued by her home-owner association for being a nuisance to her neighbors and violating the bylaws. The HOA sought to have a family member permanently enjoined from residing in the home. After settlement negotiations failed, we took the matter to trial. A civil court judge found the suit had been brought prematurely and found for the homeowner. M.Q. was charged in Federal Court by the United States Attorney with manufacture and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (more than 1000 plants) and conspiracy and faced 15-22 years in federal prison. I assisted another attorney in defending the case in a jury trial in the Northern District court in Gainesville. At the close of the Government's case we motioned the court for acquittal based on a failure to meet their burden for going forward and prevailed. M.Q. walked out of court a free person and retained her assets rather than lose them to pending forfeiture proceedings. The Mosca Law Firm 1054 Kings Ave. |
The information contained on this page is not
meant to be, nor should be construed as, legal advice. Always consult with
an attorney before making any decisions regarding your case.
The Mosca Law Firm
Copyright 2009